Back to 2000 Archive

LODI CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2002

C-1 CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL

The City Council Closed Session meeting of September 18, 2002 was called to order by Mayor Pennino at 6:22 p.m.

Present: Council Members – Hitchcock, Howard, Land, and Mayor Pennino

Absent: Council Members – Nakanishi

Also Present: City Manager Flynn, City Attorney Hays, and City Clerk Blackston

C-2 ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION

a) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; Citizens for a Quiet Kofu Park vs. City of Lodi, San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No. CV 014871 (CA)

C-3 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

At 6:22 p.m., Mayor Pennino adjourned the meeting to a Closed Session to discuss the above matter.

The Closed Session adjourned at 6:40 p.m.

C-4 RETURN TO OPEN SESSION / DISCLOSURE OF ACTION

At 7:02 p.m., Mayor Pennino reconvened the City Council meeting, and City Attorney Hays disclosed the following action.

In regard to Item C-2 (a), there was no reportable action taken by Council.

A. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL

The Regular City Council meeting of September 18, 2002 was called to order by Mayor Pennino at 7:02 p.m.

Present: Council Members – Hitchcock, Howard, Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor Pennino

Absent: Council Members – None

Also Present: City Manager Flynn, City Attorney Hays, and City Clerk Blackston

B. INVOCATION

The invocation was given by Captain Frank Severs, Lodi Salvation Army.

C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pennino.

D. AWARDS / PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

D-1 Awards – None

D-2 Proclamations – None

D-3 (a) Mayor Pennino presented a Certificate of Recognition to Alison Wong-Bertsch, owner of Memories for the Making, who has received national recognition in being named "one of the ten best scrapbook supply stores in the country" by Better Homes and Gardens Magazine.

D-3 (b) Mayor Pennino presented a Certificate of Recognition to Douglas Eigenhuis, employee of Lodi City Cab, for exemplary service in assisting stranded motorists in Lodi.

D-3 (c) Katie Whitmire, member of the Greater Lodi Area Youth Commission, provided an update to Council on the Commission’s activities and accomplishments and presented the Teen of the Month award to Cristal Wong from Liberty High School.

D-3 (d) "Update on the activities and accomplishments of the Library Board of Trustees"

NOTE: This item was heard following the Consent Calendar.

With the aid of an overhead presentation, Christine Lavond, member of the Lodi Library Board of Trustees, provided the following information:

Ø In 1999 Library Administration embarked on a long-range planning process, leading to the development of the library’s mission, which encompasses providing community members with the opportunity to learn to use the computer, have access to meeting rooms, and information to succeed academically.

Ø In the fall of 2000 the library introduced a patron’s self check-out machine.

Ø The library has a circulation of 300,000 items annually.

Ø On a monthly basis the library has 25,000 to 30,000 visitors.

Ø 10,000 youth attend the children’s programs annually.

Ø Beginning April 7, 2002 the library opened to the public on Sundays from 1:00 to 5:00 p.m.

Ø In 2000 the library received a literacy grant from the California State Library.

Ø 70 tutors teach adult students to read and write English; last year tutors devoted 4,000 hours.

Ø In 2001 the Library Board of Trustees commissioned the development of a library facilities master plan, which proposes to expand the current facility with a two-story addition, doubling its size.

____________________________________________________________________________________

E. CONSENT CALENDAR

In accordance with the report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council, on motion of Council Member Nakanishi, Hitchcock second, unanimously approved the following items hereinafter set forth except those otherwise noted:

E-1 Claims were approved in the amount of $2,095,679.45.

E-2 The minutes of August 21, 2002 (Regular Meeting), August 27, 2002 (Shirtsleeve Session), and September 3, 2002 (Shirtsleeve Session) were approved as written.

E-3 Received the report of the sale of scrap metal.

E-4 Approved the specifications for 21,000 feet of #2 jacketed 15kV concentric neutral underground electrical cable and authorized advertisement for bids.

E-5 Approved the plans and specifications for one Multifunction Primary Injection Test Set and authorized advertisement for bids.

E-6 "Adopt resolution approving replacement purchase of an AS400 mid-range computer from Logical Design, Inc., of Rancho Cordova, CA ($120,817.78)" was removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed and acted upon under the Regular Calendar.

E-7 Adopted Resolution No. 2002-190 authorizing the appropriation of an additional $15,200 for costs associated with providing temporary office facilities and other associated costs not originally anticipated, such as electric, data, and phone hookups, as well as providing for handicap access for the current Animal Shelter.

E-8 Accepted improvements under Type II Polymer Modified Slurry Seal, Various City Streets, 2002 contract.

E-9 Accepted improvements under Lodi Station Parking Structure, 50 North Sacramento Street, contract; and received notification of Contract Change Orders.

E-10 Adopted Resolution No. 2002-191 appointing to the California Transit Insurance Pool (CalTIP) Board of Directors the City of Lodi Senior Human Resources Analyst as Director, and the City of Lodi Transportation Manger as Alternate Director.

E-11 Set public hearing for October 16, 2002 to consider electric rate changes for all classes excluding Residential SHARE Program and Residential Medical Rider due to California Independent System Operator (CAISO) charges.

____________________________________________________________________________________

F. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

None.

G. PUBLIC HEARINGS

G-1 Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Pennino called for the Public Hearing to consider the Technical Equipment Purchase Proposal for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program.

Police Captain Main reported that in July 2002 the Police Department applied for a grant in the amount of $85,000, which would include matching funds of $8,500. The matching funds will come from the 2002-03 Police Department budget. An advisory board met on August 7 and it was the consensus of the board to use the grant funds for police technology.

In reply to Council Member Land, Captain Main confirmed that any purchases from the grant will first come to the Council for approval.

Hearing Opened to the Public

None.

Public Portion of Hearing Closed

MOTION / VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Council Member Land, Howard second, unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2002-192 approving the Technical Equipment Purchase Proposal for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program.

H. COMMUNICATIONS

H-1 Claims filed against the City of Lodi – None

H-2 Reports: Boards/Commissions/Task Forces/Committees – None

H-3 Appointments – None

H-4 Miscellaneous

a) City Clerk Blackston presented the cumulative Monthly Protocol Account Report from July 1 through August 31, 2002.

I. REGULAR CALENDAR

I-1 "Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lodi and various railroads to construct track improvements allowing abandonment of the existing Lodi Avenue railroad tracks; and adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Mark Thomas & Company ($428,054) for final design services and authorizing the City Manager to execute Measure K Cooperative Design and Construction Agreements; and appropriate $7,275,000 for the project"

Public Works Director Prima reported that staff has been negotiating with three railroads regarding this project. The main goal of the project is to remove the railroad tracks on Lodi Avenue from the main line UP track to Cherokee Lane, with a secondary goal to maintain proper rail service to all industries on the east side. The solution arrived at was to reactivate the old Kentucky House branch along Lockeford Street and Victor Road. This involved rebuilding the track and the connections at the main line and rebuilding tracks along Lockeford Street and Victor Road, in addition to building a new track connection at the CCT near the Eastside Winery. The project also included constructing an interchange yard along the main line tracks north of Lockeford Street to allow traffic that is on the main line track to drop cars off, and the CCT to pick them up to take them to the industries. The preliminary cost estimate for the project was $7 million. The railroads have agreed to accept the concept plan and a maximum contribution from the City of $6.7 million. The City needs to design the improvements and acquire land for the track connection. The Council of Governments will be providing grant money through the Measure K program.

In reply to Council Member Howard, Mr. Prima stated that City funds (budgeted in 2001-03) will be coming out of the street impact fees, because as part of the project, the City will be acquiring right of way to allow eventual widening of Lockeford Street and Victor Road.

Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock asked what projects the City is giving up by using Measure K funds on this project.

Mr. Prima explained that the history of the project goes back to the Measure K element that had funding for grade separations. Only one grade separation in Lodi was identified in the Measure K expenditure plan, which was on Lodi Avenue. The cost of the grade separation was over $13 million and Council decided to drop the project and asked that the Measure K money ($3 million) be redirected to the railroad track removal project. Subsequent to that, the City was able to obtain additional funding from Measure K out of the Congestion Relief Program.

Council Member Howard clarified for citizens that the first step is paving over the railroad tracks. The track removal will be done later, as the rail plan is developed.

Mayor Pennino noted that in addition to paving over the tracks, staff will begin working with property owners on an entrance off Lodi Avenue to the Orchard and K-Mart shopping center.

MOTION/ VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Mayor Pennino, Land second, unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2002-193 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lodi and various railroads to construct track improvements allowing abandonment of the existing Lodi Avenue railroad tracks; and adopted Resolution No. 2002-194 authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., for final design services associated with the Lodi Avenue railroad track removal, authorizing the City Manager to execute Measure K Cooperative Design and Construction Agreements for the project, and further appropriating funds in the amount of $7,275,000 for the project.

I-2 "Adopt resolution approving the City of Lodi Fire Department Paramedic Business Plan (Ambulance Transportation Program) allowing the City to provide paramedic service and implement an emergency transportation program"

City Manager Flynn stated that the matters under consideration are: 1) whether the public sector should provide a service that is already being provided by the private sector, 2) whether the Fire Department should have paramedics on staff; and if so, 3) whether the Fire Department should also have ambulance transport to help offset the cost of paramedics. He noted that this will need to be brought back for funding discussion during 2003-05 budget meetings.

Chief Pretz believed that the Fire Department’s proposal will enhance public safety and pre-hospital emergency care. It will provide rapid response though the use of dual role firefighter paramedics and provide timely transport of sick and injured people to the nearest facility. Chief Pretz read the following letter into the record (filed):

"This letter will represent Lodi Memorial Hospital’s support of improving the ambulance service in the Lodi area. As you know, Lodi Memorial Hospital has experienced significant growth in the number of ambulance arrivals to our emergency room over the past few years. The increase in arrivals was 15% greater for 2001 compared to 2002 and averaged 13 per day in 2001. The increase has only been 2% for the first 6 months of this year, yet this growth is substantial and challenges our resources to provide good quality care.

"Although the increases in ambulance arrivals are not solely from the Lodi area, all the ambulance stations that bring patients to us have increased. As we plan our future we anticipate that this increase in ambulance arrivals will continue.

"We are not in a position to determine the economic impact of another ambulance service in the Lodi area, but would be supportive of any move to increase the response time and quality of care delivered to our Lodi residents. I trust that our city council will give your proposal sufficient thought and make the appropriate decisions for the Lodi community. Signed Joseph P. Harrington, CEO"

Chief Pretz reported that records indicate the Council has been concerned about ambulance service for several years. In October 2000 the Fire Department was directed by Council to continue to evaluate a paramedic program. In January 2002 the Department presented Council with preliminary options. Council then directed the Fire Department to further define options and report back, which it did in July 2002. The Department was then directed by Council to develop a business plan to include emergency medical transportation. In October 2002 a former American Medical Response (AMR) supervisor reported to Council that there were only two ambulances in Lodi and they were used for interfacility transport when necessary.

Chief Pretz stated that the Fire Department’s proposed emergency medical services program would be implemented over a three-year period. Describing the program, he reported the following information:

Ø Prior to fiscal year 2003-04 it would be necessary to hire an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Coordinator.

Ø In 2003-04 six firefighter paramedics would be hired and one ambulance would be purchased, along with all necessary equipment. The Fire Department would then begin providing service to the City of Lodi in Zone 4. Chief Pretz noted that earlier in the year the Department was informed that it has been approved to receive an Office of Traffic Safety grant in the amount of $33,000 for the purchase of an ambulance.

Ø In 2004-05 six additional firefighter paramedics would be hired and a second ambulance would be purchased and placed into service.

Ø In 2005-06 three additional firefighter paramedics would be hired and a third ambulance would be purchased to serve as a reserve.

In describing the financial aspect of the program, Chief Pretz provided the following information:

Ø Gross billing charges are based on five calls per day for the first fiscal year, seven calls per day in the second fiscal year, and ten calls per day in the third fiscal year.

Ø A 64% to 65% collection rate is assumed.

Ø The total expense for the transportation proposal in the first year is $764,184, the second year cumulative total is $1,246,632, and the third year cumulative total is $1,542,740.

Ø The proposed voluntary subscription service for emergency ambulance transport was calculated at $36 a year, with 30% of the 20,692 households participating, totaling $233,488 in revenue. The annual subscription service would cover all members of a household. If AMR provided the emergency ambulance transport, the City would pay them $150 per transport.

Ø If the cost recovery proposal was instituted, the cost to the City to provide paramedic services would be $62,000 in the first year; without it, the cost would total $592,000.

In response to questions posed by Council Member Land, Chief Pretz reported that according to figures obtained from Lodi Memorial Hospital they receive 4,055 ambulance arrivals annually. His calculations assume that the Fire Department will receive 30% to 40% of those calls, at an average of five per day in 2003. NFPA 1710 will require additional fire personnel, which Chief Pretz anticipated requesting in July 2003. He reported that in 2001 there were 301 times that ambulances arrived in excess of the eight minute response time. The ambulance compliance rate in 2001 with the county response time requirement was 89%.

Council Member Land reported that on November 2, 2000 the City of Lodi Fire Department had a meeting with AMR to request that at least one ambulance be stationed in the City after 8:00 p.m.

In reply to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Chief Pretz explained that the difference in collection rates from city to city depends on how soon the billing goes out, the payer mix, the number of indigent persons, etc. After speaking with various billing agencies, he believed that a 65% collection rate assumption was a conservative number. He acknowledged that 15 paramedics works out to be one per company and that he would likely need to ask for additional personnel to cover for vacations, sick time, etc. The results of a survey of current Lodi Fire Department firefighters found that only two or three are interested in becoming paramedics. Chief Pretz explained that his proposal is to hire paramedics and train them to be firefighters. In reference to the Joint Powers Authority, he stated that paramedics and ambulances would not be excluded from coverage. In response to a communication Ms. Hitchcock stated she had received pertaining to taking calls outside the city limits, Chief Pretz stated that he did not believe it would cause a labor problem.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Council Member Howard stated that if there were job losses it would be because of the actions of AMR, not the City.

Mr. Bonifay countered that there are a limited number of calls in the community and he indicated that the demand probably would not support six ambulances.

In answer to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Bonifay reported that AMR offers its employees a 401K with a 6% matching contribution from the employer.

In response to questions posed by Council Member Land, Mr. Meyer stated that the governing body given the authority to oversee the EMS system is the County Board of Supervisors. He explained that the reason AMR hired an attorney to go before the Board of Supervisors was because ambulances were being placed in stations without any organizational approach and a system should be in place to serve the best interest of the community. Mr. Meyer confirmed that there are currently three Advanced Life Support (ALS) units and one Basic Life Support (BLS) unit in Lodi. AMR is not going to downgrade those units and will continue to monitor the system to see if an enhanced level of service becomes necessary due to increased demand. He reported that tomorrow, AMR is having an inspection of a third station within the city limits, which will house the third ambulance in the community. He declared that it is never the intent of AMR to have only one ambulance in the City of Lodi because it takes more than that to do the job. He confirmed that AMR is willing to pay the difference in salary between a firefighter and a firefighter paramedic, which was estimated at approximately $7,600. In addition, he reported that AMR owns the Northern California Training Institute and has agreed to place Lodi firefighters in the classes to obtain paramedic training. He explained that through an RFP process, AMR became the sole exclusive provider for emergency medical transport services in Santa Clara County. AMR has deployed Supplemental Transport Ambulance Resource (STAR) units in the cities of San Jose and Santa Clara. The units are placed in fire stations. AMR provides the ambulance and the fire departments of these cities provide the paramedic and EMT to staff them when it is necessary to use the units. Mr. Meyer offered to place a STAR unit under a similar arrangement in Lodi.

"After much consideration and separate review by our Government Relations Committee and the Board of Directors, the Chamber Board is formally going on record in opposition to the current proposal to establish a City-run ambulance service.

"Our reasons for this position are not without recognition that the Lodi Fire Department is second to none and we are confident the department would operate an exemplary emergency transport service.

"We find the plan to be unfavorable to private business, for which the Chamber stands. Those identifiable and defining needs, which would call for a City-operated service have yet to be proven through our investigation or to our satisfaction. The ‘state of the market’ for emergency transport is driven by competition from other service providers as well as County government’s control of the system, under which transport must operate. This makes income truly unpredictable. Therefore, we believe this is an unnecessary risk of tax dollars.

"We believe it has not been satisfactorily proven the current provider, American Medical Response, has performed poorly, thus putting in jeopardy the citizenry and the employee workforce of Lodi County Emergency Medical Service verifies AMR to be meeting or exceeding their mandated criteria and service levels.

"If, in your minds this is about service, safety, and protection – add paramedics to current firefighting equipment. If it is about a source of revenue, our Board is concerned about the dependability of a positive cash flow from such a service. We believe the opportunity to recoup all associated costs providing emergency transport service is more determined by the number of providers in the market, County configuration of service, and non-emergency transport billing contracts. Even expertly operated by our City Fire Department personnel, considering these factors are out of Lodi’s control, how can anyone, no matter how good, be confident of a profit?

"If ‘breakeven’ is not achieved, then City ambulances will be subsidized by tax dollars. Why risk entering a new business field with uncontrollable market determinants, if we do not have to?

"In conclusion, if AMR has been negligent in their levels of service, then bring public pressure to bear. As our City Council, you are capable of galvanizing a community’s focus as well as that of the media’s, to demand the people and businesses of Lodi be adequately protected at acceptable levels. We have not heard that degree of tenacious resoluteness from this Council, nor from the Fire Department, nor from the County Emergency Medical Services regarding AMR’s service. Why?

"We remain open to be supportive of other plans should they be developed."

In summation, Mr. Patrick stated that there appears to be an unstable market right now. He defined "unstable" as meaning there are many ambulance providers providing service in Stockton that is driving change into the system. It is an inopportune time for the City to invest in this endeavor. Some providers have expressed an interest in providing ambulance services to Lodi, which would further reduce the opportunity of a return for the Lodi Fire Department. He has spoken with Elaine Hatch Director of the County’s EMS who agreed that the numbers coming out of the Stockton Dispatch Center are flawed. If the Fire Department were to get into the ambulance business and be licensed by the County, the Lodi ambulances would have to go outside the city limits. Mr. Patrick believed this to be another disadvantage. He remarked that if this issue is about better service, then there must be a better plan than what was presented tonight.

Council Member Howard believed that AMR’s offer to pay the salary differential and provide training for firefighters proves that there is a profit to be made through transport. She asked Mr. Patrick, as a business individual, why the City should not try to gain as much cost recovery as possible by providing the service of transport. As a comparison, she stated that by not doing so, it would be akin to the Chamber of Commerce offering the Farmers Market and similar events, without collecting any revenue for them. She emphasized the importance of having a business plan and recovering as much cost as possible.

In response to Council Member Howard, Mr. Parker reported that Priority One’s headquarters is located in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The company has been in existence for six years and is a spin off of Priority One Long Distance, a California public utility. Mr. Parker stated that he believed Chief Pretz’ financial report was off by hundreds of thousands of dollars.

"In order to promote their plans the fire departments in the cities of Lodi and/or Stockton may state that there is a crisis in ambulance service in their cities. This is not backed up by evidence or reliable facts. The fire department in Stockton is alleging there is a shortage of ambulances; however, no valid information has been presented to demonstrate this problem is true. EMS staff has made repeated requests for the past three years to get information which will substantiate these charges. The fire department staff in Stockton and Lodi have also alleged there are quality problems in ambulance responses, i.e. slow response. Yet these complaints have not been documented and presented to the EMS agency staff to examine or investigate. In the past several weeks EMS has met with representatives from the representatives of the fire departments of the City of Stockton, Lodi, AMR Regional Manager, and the City Manager for the City of Lodi. EMS agency offered to bring all interested parties together to address these issues, but this invitation was rebuffed by the city fire departments."

Mr. Johnson referenced another letter from Elaine Hatch, in which it mentioned that the County EMS hired a consultant to review the data from the Dispatch Center. The consultant’s preliminary findings are that the current data is not sufficiently reliable. Through May 2002 the EMS agency has not received any reports or patient complaints about ambulances not responding or where delays resulted in poor patient care. At the July Shirtsleeve Session of the City Council an emergency room doctor stated it was his opinion that there was no problem relative to ambulance service. Mr. Johnson questioned why no one has seriously explored the offer by AMR to provide training and salary subsidy for paramedics. This is a significant benefit with no additional cost to the community. Under Chief Pretz’ proposal, if a citizen in Lodi uses an ambulance they will be paying for the service through their insurance, taxes, and a subscription fee. He emphasized that the Council should consider the financial impacts that NFPA 1710 will have on the City’s budget.

Council Member Land reported that 69% of calls are for emergency medical and half of those are ALS 1 calls. He expressed support for placing paramedics on Fire Department engines and allowing AMR to provide transport.

Council Member Nakanishi supported the Fire Department providing paramedic services to improve patient care, but was opposed to ambulance transport, due to financial concerns and the risk involved.

Mayor Pennino also favored providing paramedics on Fire Department engines, but was opposed to transport. He believed that benchmark standards should be developed, and encouraged emergency service providers to sit down together and work on ways to improve response times within the county. If benchmarks are not met, then the Council should reconsider the Fire Department providing ambulance transport. He asked the City Manager to look into the issue of finding locations to place ambulances in the community. He was supportive of allowing other private ambulance providers to serve Lodi. He voiced strong opposition to subscription services.

Council Member Howard stated that she was delighted to hear that the Council was unanimously in favor of having paramedics in the Fire Department. She believed it was important to provide transport services as well. She stated that there are firefighters who would like to work as firefighter paramedics. The City has lost some very qualified and talented firefighters to other areas that provide paramedic transport services. It is important to recruit and sustain the employees that come to Lodi. She reiterated the importance of having a business plan if the City is going to have additional costs associated with placing paramedics in the Fire Department. She acknowledged that there are discrepancies in Chief Pretz’ proposal; however, she believed that they are insignificant to the "bottom line" and after a few years of the initial start up costs, the program would break even. She conjectured that the Council would be addressing this topic in the years to come. She described scenarios in which the Fire Department providing transport services would be beneficial, most specifically, that of having an adequate volume of ambulances in the City for response.

Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock stated that as a Council Member she has an obligation to look at providing as much revenue as possible to offset the cost of services. She voiced support for the Fire Department’s proposal.

MOTION #1 / VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Council Member Land, Nakanishi second, unanimously directed the Lodi Fire Department to proceed with providing paramedics on its engine companies and present the City Council with a plan during the 2003-04 budget cycle to phase in the program.

MOTION #2:
Council Member Land made a motion, Pennino second, to direct the Lodi Fire Department to form a public/private partnership with American Medical Response (AMR) for the following services as offered by AMR:

DISCUSSION:
Council Member Howard stated that she was not in favor of a partnership.

Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock agreed and added that the City needs to maximize its revenue for the additional cost of providing paramedics.

VOTE:
The above motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members – Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor Pennino
Noes: Council Members – Hitchcock and Howard
Absent: Council Members – None

RECESS

At 10:40 p.m., Mayor Pennino called for a recess and the City Council meeting reconvened at 10:50 p.m.

I. REGULAR CALENDAR (Continued)

E-6 "Adopt resolution approving replacement purchase of an AS400 mid-range computer from Logical Design, Inc., of Rancho Cordova, CA ($120,817.78)"

At the request of Council Member Hitchcock, Information Systems Division Manager Mann explained that the City has a five-year old computer that will not be supported by IBM in the near future. An opportunity now exists to replace it for a 50% discount. A new computer will provide upgradeability of the City’s software and it will result in dramatic improvements in performance.

In reply to Mayor Pennino, Mr. Mann reported that the current AS400 operating system has been upgraded to version 4.

City Manager Flynn stated that $50,000 a year had been budgeted for the purpose of upgrading the system.

MOTION / VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Howard second, unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2002-195 approving the replacement purchase of an AS400 mid-range computer from Logical Design, Inc., of Rancho Cordova, in the amount of $120,817.78.

J. ORDINANCES

J-1 Ordinance No. 1717 entitled, "An Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City Of Lodi Repealing Ordinance No. 1713 Relating To The Adopting Of The Redevelopment Plan For The Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1" having been introduced at a regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held September 4, 2002 was brought up for passage on motion of Council Member Land, Howard second. Second reading of the ordinance was omitted after reading by title, and the ordinance was then adopted and ordered to print by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members – Hitchcock, Howard, Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor Pennino
Noes: Council Members – None
Absent: Council Members – None
Abstain: Council Members – None

K. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

City Attorney Hays said the decision was non substantive and did not deal with the merits of the case.

Mayor Pennino replied that an update on the issue will be scheduled, and discussion about a second opinion can occur at that time.

L. COMMENTS BY THE CITY MANAGER ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

M. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m.

ATTEST:

Susan J. Blackston
City Clerk